Suresh Martand Pawar vs Sangli Miraj Kupwad Muncipal Corporation Commissioner — 65/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

Awaiting Summons Next hearing 04-May-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN020003722026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

402/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

65/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli

Judge

5-Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

1.Suresh Martand Pawar

Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar
2.Pandurang Martand Pawar

Adv. Mursal Aarbaz Abdulsattar

Respondent(s)

1.Sangli Miraj Kupwad Muncipal Corporation Commissioner

Case History

04-May-2026

Next hearingPending
02-Apr-2026

Awaiting Summons

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
20-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' request for interim injunction but issued notice to the Municipal Corporation (defendant) to respond on the issue by April 2, 2026. The court found that while the plaintiffs challenged the designated officer's authority to issue a demolition notice and claimed procedural irregularities, possession documents alone do not validate unauthorized construction, and the matter requires the defendant's defense before any final order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
20-Mar-2026

Compliance

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
18-Mar-2026

Compliance

Vth Jt CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Sangli
07-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
06-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' request for interim injunction but issued notice to the Municipal Corporation (defendant) to respond on the issue by April 2, 2026. The court found that while the plaintiffs challenged the designated officer's authority to issue a demolition notice and claimed procedural irregularities, possession documents alone do not validate unauthorized construction, and the matter requires the defendant's defense before any final order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.