Aruna Patil vs Indubai Patil etc.6 Advocate - Hingamire Shailendra Rajaram — 200045/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26andord7R.1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHSN020003152013
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200346/2013
Filing Date
20-02-2013
Registration No
200045/2013
Registration Date
28-02-2013
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli
Judge
2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aruna Patil
Adv. Mane Nitin Krishnaji
Respondent(s)
Indubai Patil etc.6 Advocate - Hingamire Shailendra Rajaram
Vikas Patil
Adv. Hingmire Shailedra Rajaram
Sou. Shobha Mane
Adv. Hingmire Shailedra Rajaram
Sou. Swati Patil
Adv. Kotawal Faruk N
Sou. Sonali Patil
Adv. Kotwal Faruk Nazirahmed
Manager Bank Of India
Adv. Patil Bhaskar Nana
Chairman, Sarva Sewva Saha- Soci.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-12-2025 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the petition filed by Aruna Patil against Indubai Patil (deceased) and her heirs (Defendants 2 and 3). Since Defendant 1, Indubai Shivaji Patil, is deceased, the application to substitute her legal heirs as defendants was granted. The court directed that all defendants' statements be recorded and they be given an opportunity to present evidence, as the case involves issues of succession, determination of rights, and maintenance claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the petition filed by Aruna Patil against Indubai Patil (deceased) and her heirs (Defendants 2 and 3). Since Defendant 1, Indubai Shivaji Patil, is deceased, the application to substitute her legal heirs as defendants was granted. The court directed that all defendants' statements be recorded and they be given an opportunity to present evidence, as the case involves issues of succession, determination of rights, and maintenance claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts