Milind Ramrao Patil vs Adhik Jaywant Patil Advocate - Upadhye Sanjay Manohar — 27/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN020001092022
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
113/2022
Filing Date
15-01-2022
Registration No
27/2022
Registration Date
19-01-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli
Judge
5-Vth JT CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C. SANGLI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Milind Ramrao Patil
Adv. Narawade Vishwajit Bhausaheb
Respondent(s)
Adhik Jaywant Patil Advocate - Upadhye Sanjay Manohar
Shubham Rajendra Patil
Tolabai Ramrao Patil
Ujjawala Shrimant Patil
Kiran Ramrao Patil(Legal Heir)
Bhaskar Ramrao Patil
Rangrao Pandurang Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Vth JT CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C. SANGLI
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 01-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed Defendant No. 1's application to set aside the "No cross" order, enabling the defendant to cross-examine the plaintiff's evidence in a permanent injunction suit, in the interest of justice and fair trial. However, the defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the plaintiff on or before the next date, and failure to comply would result in the original "No cross" order remaining in force. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed Defendant No. 1's application to set aside the "No cross" order, enabling the defendant to cross-examine the plaintiff's evidence in a permanent injunction suit, in the interest of justice and fair trial. However, the defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as cost to the plaintiff on or before the next date, and failure to comply would result in the original "No cross" order remaining in force. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts