Swati Harishchandra Patil etc.1 vs Aruna Rajesh Patil etc.1 Advocate - Mane Nitin Krishnaji — 200006/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26andord7R.1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHSN020000452013
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200041/2013
Filing Date
05-01-2013
Registration No
200006/2013
Registration Date
07-01-2013
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Sangli
Judge
2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Swati Harishchandra Patil etc.1
Adv. Kotwal Faruk Nazirahmed
Sou. Sonali Patil
Respondent(s)
Aruna Rajesh Patil etc.1 Advocate - Mane Nitin Krishnaji
Smt. Indubai Shivaji Patil
Adv. Mane Nitin Krishnaji
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION SANGLI
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition (Petition No. 137) filed under Special Case No. 6/2013 before the Sangli court has been allowed/granted. The court excused the delay in producing the Will/Succession Record of Defendant No. 2 (Shivaji Patel, who died on 19/08/2023) and set aside the order issued against Defendant No. 2 for non-compliance. The court found it appropriate to include Defendant No. 2's heirs as parties to the suit given the circumstances and the death of the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition (Petition No. 137) filed under Special Case No. 6/2013 before the Sangli court has been allowed/granted. The court excused the delay in producing the Will/Succession Record of Defendant No. 2 (Shivaji Patel, who died on 19/08/2023) and set aside the order issued against Defendant No. 2 for non-compliance. The court found it appropriate to include Defendant No. 2's heirs as parties to the suit given the circumstances and the death of the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts