Ramkrishna Babaji Dalvi vs Parshuram Arjun Dalvi Advocate - R.S. Gavhankar — 33/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI100002622021
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
47/2021
Filing Date
05-10-2021
Registration No
33/2021
Registration Date
05-10-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Dodamarg
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., DODAMARG
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramkrishna Babaji Dalvi
Adv. S.A.Gawas
Respondent(s)
Parshuram Arjun Dalvi Advocate - R.S. Gavhankar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., DODAMARG
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
A. D. R.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-02-2026 | A. D. R. |
Interim Orders
Summary: The plaintiff's application for late production of documents in Civil Suit No. 33 of 2021 was allowed by the Civil Judge at Dodamarg. Although the defendant opposed the application citing non-compliance with Order-VII, Rule-14 of the CPC, the court exercised its discretion to permit production of the documents as they were deemed relevant and necessary for deciding the suit on merits. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The plaintiff's application for late production of documents in Civil Suit No. 33 of 2021 was allowed by the Civil Judge at Dodamarg. Although the defendant opposed the application citing non-compliance with Order-VII, Rule-14 of the CPC, the court exercised its discretion to permit production of the documents as they were deemed relevant and necessary for deciding the suit on merits. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts