State of Maharashtra, Police Station, Dodamart vs Santosh Rajaram Gawas Advocate - Bliram Vishvanath Naik — 53/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSI100001132023

Case disposed

Filing Number

88/2023

Filing Date

05-06-2023

Registration No

53/2023

Registration Date

05-06-2023

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Dodamarg

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., DODAMARG

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra, Police Station, Dodamart

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Santosh Rajaram Gawas Advocate - Bliram Vishvanath Naik

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., DODAMARG

11-03-2026

Disposed

18-02-2026

B.W._Ready

07-01-2026

B.W._Ready

08-12-2025

B.W._Ready

03-11-2025

B.W._Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court in Dodamarg acquitted Santosh Rajaram Gavs of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of 12 bottles of alcohol, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court invoked Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, to close proceedings and ordered acquittal due to inadequate witness testimony and procedural deficiencies in the investigation, particularly regarding proper panchnama (formal inventory) documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court in Dodamarg acquitted Santosh Rajaram Gavs of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of 12 bottles of alcohol, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court invoked Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, to close proceedings and ordered acquittal due to inadequate witness testimony and procedural deficiencies in the investigation, particularly regarding proper panchnama (formal inventory) documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Dodamarg All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case