Parshuram Arjun Dalvi(Legal Heir) vs Ramkrishna Babaji Dalvi Advocate - Gawas S. A. — 17/2019

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSI100000772019

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

18/2019

Filing Date

24-04-2019

Registration No

17/2019

Registration Date

17-07-2019

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Dodamarg

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., DODAMARG

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Parshuram Arjun Dalvi(Legal Heir)

Adv. Gavankar R.S.1.

Amita Parshuram Dalvi 1.

Nakul Parshuram Dalvi 1.

Mangal Pandurang Thanekar @ Bhima Parshuram Dalvi 1.

Sachi Sham Gawas @ Vaishali Parshuram Dalvi 1.

Kasturi Parshuram Dalvi

Respondent(s)

Ramkrishna Babaji Dalvi Advocate - Gawas S. A.

Babaji Rama Dalvi

Narayan Jango Gawas

Premnath Babaji Dalvi

Kamalavati Babaji Gawas

Shubham Deuoo Dalvi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., DODAMARG

22-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

08-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

18-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

11-03-2026

Hearing

11-02-2026

A. D. R.

Interim Orders

29-03-2023
Order on T.I.
21-01-2026
Evidence
18-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The defendant's application seeking production of certain documents was allowed. Although the plaintiff opposed the application on grounds that the documents were not presented at the required stage under Order-8, Rule-1A of the CPC, the court exercised its discretion to permit late production, finding the documents relevant to the suit and necessary for deciding the case on merits. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The defendant's application seeking production of certain documents was allowed. Although the plaintiff opposed the application on grounds that the documents were not presented at the required stage under Order-8, Rule-1A of the CPC, the court exercised its discretion to permit late production, finding the documents relevant to the suit and necessary for deciding the case on merits. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Dodamarg All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case