The State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Department, Kankavli vs Sachin Suresh Gothankar Advocate - BODAS PRAKASH VISHNU — 87/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI090002242025
Filing Number
134/2025
Filing Date
06-06-2025
Registration No
87/2025
Registration Date
06-06-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Devgad
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
133
Police Station
State Excise Department Other
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Department, Kankavli
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Sachin Suresh Gothankar Advocate - BODAS PRAKASH VISHNU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-02-2026 | Plea / Particulars |
| 12-01-2026 | Plea / Particulars |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged accused Sachin Suresh Gothankar of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act due to the prosecution's failure to file a mandatory Chemical Analysis (C.A.) certificate and examine witnesses, making proof of the offense impossible. The case was closed under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized liquor was directed to be disposed of by the Excise Office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged accused Sachin Suresh Gothankar of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act due to the prosecution's failure to file a mandatory Chemical Analysis (C.A.) certificate and examine witnesses, making proof of the offense impossible. The case was closed under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized liquor was directed to be disposed of by the Excise Office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts