Balkrishna Maruti Sawant(Legal Heir) vs Jayvant Maruti Sawant, etc 11 Advocate - BODAS PRAKASH VISHNU — 60/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O4R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI090001952016
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
86/2016
Filing Date
27-07-2016
Registration No
60/2016
Registration Date
27-07-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Devgad
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balkrishna Maruti Sawant(Legal Heir)
Adv. NAIK VEERESH RAMCHANDRA1.
Akshay Balkrushan Sawant 1.
Geeta Balkrushan Sawant 1.
Dolly Balkrushan Sawant
Respondent(s)
Jayvant Maruti Sawant, etc 11 Advocate - BODAS PRAKASH VISHNU
Sadanand Maruti Sawant(Legal Heir)
Adv. RAORANE RAJENDRA VISHRAM
Chandrakant Maruti Sawant
Suchita Suresh Sawant
Pradnya Pravin Rane
Adv. NAIK VEERESH RAMCHANDRA
Mahadev Vasudev Parab(Legal Heir)
Adv. RAORANE RAJENDRA VISHRAM
Prakash Vasudev Parab(Legal Heir)
Adv. RAORANE RAJENDRA VISHRAM
Nalini@Asha Digambar Gawade
Adv. RAORANE RAJENDRA VISHRAM
Malini@Sangita Ramdas Patil
Adv. RAORANE RAJENDRA VISHRAM
Pushpalata@Anamika Baban Shinde
Adv. RAORANE RAJENDRA VISHRAM
Vijaya Vasudev Parab
Adv. RAORANE RAJENDRA VISHRAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Order on Exhibit
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition (Application No. 189) to amend the suit by substituting one of the defendants (Defendant No. 1) and consolidating related claims into a single case. The court found that since the defendant did not challenge the date of death and in the interests of justice and complete resolution of disputes between the parties, the amendment application was necessary and approved. The plaintiff was directed to complete the required formalities within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition (Application No. 189) to amend the suit by substituting one of the defendants (Defendant No. 1) and consolidating related claims into a single case. The court found that since the defendant did not challenge the date of death and in the interests of justice and complete resolution of disputes between the parties, the amendment application was necessary and approved. The plaintiff was directed to complete the required formalities within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts