Shri Parshuram Pandurang Loke vs Anil Pandurang Loke etc. 15 Advocate - MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR — 62/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 19. Status: Ex-Parte Order. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI090001792025
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-04-2025
Filing Number
79/2025
Filing Date
21-04-2025
Registration No
62/2025
Registration Date
21-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Devgad
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri Parshuram Pandurang Loke
Adv. GORE DEVANAND RAMKRISHNA
Respondent(s)
Anil Pandurang Loke etc. 15 Advocate - MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Chandrakant Nana Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Aniket Vijay Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Dipti Pradip Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Hemchandra Prakash Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Paresh Gajanan Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Jayesh Shailendra Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Mahadev Eknath Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Vasudev Devu Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Ashok Gangaram Loke
Satyavijay Gangaram Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Vilas Mahadev Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Poonam Hemchandra Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Anant Bajirao Loke
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Sachin Shridhar Gavkar
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Ex-Parte Order
Ex-Parte Order
Ex-Parte Order
Ex-Parte Order
Ex-Parte Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 11-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 18-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 22-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 19-12-2025 | Ex-Parte Order |
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected the application for defendants No.1, 2, 3, 4, 14, and 15 as 90 days had lapsed since suit summons was served on them. The application was allowed for defendants No.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13 who appeared in court. Suit summons was ordered to be issued as prayed, with adjournment granted to the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the application for defendants No.1, 2, 3, 4, 14, and 15 as 90 days had lapsed since suit summons was served on them. The application was allowed for defendants No.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13 who appeared in court. Suit summons was ordered to be issued as prayed, with adjournment granted to the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts