The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Devgad vs Aditya Vikas Kadam Advocate - Siddhesh Avinash Mangaonkar — 16/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,324,504,506,201,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI090001772024
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
125/2024
Filing Date
01-06-2024
Registration No
16/2024
Registration Date
01-06-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Devgad
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
Police Station Deogad
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Devgad
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Aditya Vikas Kadam Advocate - Siddhesh Avinash Mangaonkar
Vikas Chandrakant Kadam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of Prosecution Witness No. 05, Dr. Tanmay Sunil Aathvale, a doctor who examined patient Yashvant Kadam and found a fracture on his left leg above the knee, issuing a medical certificate (Exhibit P3/PW5). During cross-examination, the defense established that the patient reported a fall one week prior and had not sought immediate treatment, and that such injuries and associated pain are consistent with accidental falls. The deposition was completed on 11/03/2026 before Judicial Magistrate F.C. at Deogad, with the accused present and given opportunity to cross-examine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of Prosecution Witness No. 05, Dr. Tanmay Sunil Aathvale, a doctor who examined patient Yashvant Kadam and found a fracture on his left leg above the knee, issuing a medical certificate (Exhibit P3/PW5). During cross-examination, the defense established that the patient reported a fall one week prior and had not sought immediate treatment, and that such injuries and associated pain are consistent with accidental falls. The deposition was completed on 11/03/2026 before Judicial Magistrate F.C. at Deogad, with the accused present and given opportunity to cross-examine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts