The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Devgad vs Rama Mallari Kare — 52/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSI090001142026

Filing Number

67/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

52/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Devgad

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED AND SENTENCED

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

Police Station Deogad

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Devgad

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rama Mallari Kare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The Devgad Magistrate Court convicted accused Rama Mallari Kare under Indian Penal Code Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire/explosive substance) for recklessly parking a vehicle in a dangerous manner on March 3, 2026, endangering public safety and traffic. The accused pleaded guilty after being informed of consequences, and the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 with an alternative simple imprisonment of two days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Devgad Magistrate Court convicted accused Rama Mallari Kare under Indian Penal Code Section 285 (negligent conduct with fire/explosive substance) for recklessly parking a vehicle in a dangerous manner on March 3, 2026, endangering public safety and traffic. The accused pleaded guilty after being informed of consequences, and the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 with an alternative simple imprisonment of two days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case