Ramesh Anant Gore vs Shrikrishna Vitthal Girkar, etc 5 Advocate - MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR, Marathe — 900016/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderIVRule1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI090000602015
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
900022/2015
Filing Date
12-03-2015
Registration No
900016/2015
Registration Date
12-03-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Devgad
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh Anant Gore
Adv. BODAS PRAKASH VISHNU
Respondent(s)
Shrikrishna Vitthal Girkar, etc 5 Advocate - MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR, Marathe
Devendrakumar Vitthal Girkar
Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR
Suchitra Shankar Chavan
Adv. SAWANT UMESH SURESH
Rasika Ramakant Chavan
Adv. SAWANT UMESH SURESH
Sulochana Vitthal Girkar
Adv. SAWANT UMESH SURESH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The petition filed by Defendant No. 2 seeking correction of the affidavit filed under Rule 17 of Order 6 CPC is dismissed as not maintainable. The court found that the alleged defects and illegalities in clauses 3 and 8 of the affidavit are without merit, and no correction is warranted. The court also rejected the grounds raised in the petition as baseless and dismissed the application with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The petition filed by Defendant No. 2 seeking correction of the affidavit filed under Rule 17 of Order 6 CPC is dismissed as not maintainable. The court found that the alleged defects and illegalities in clauses 3 and 8 of the affidavit are without merit, and no correction is warranted. The court also rejected the grounds raised in the petition as baseless and dismissed the application with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts