Arvind Pandurang Bapardekar vs Suchita Sabaji Bapardekar @ Shraddha Vidyadhar Dhoke — 11/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4(1). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSI090000462022

Arguments

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

18/2022

Filing Date

01-02-2022

Registration No

11/2022

Registration Date

01-02-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Devgad

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 4(1)

Petitioner(s)

Arvind Pandurang Bapardekar

Adv. MARATHE KAUSTUBH KAMALAKAR, Veena Mukesh Limye, Aparna Subhashchandra Paranjape, Girish Bharat Bhide, ANJALI ANIL HARSHE, ANVI ABHAY KULKARNI

Respondent(s)

Suchita Sabaji Bapardekar @ Shraddha Vidyadhar Dhoke

Rajesh Sabaji Bapardekar

Poonam Sarvottam Bapardekar @ Snehal Shekhar Jadhav

Pritam Sarvottam Bapardekar @ Aditi Anant Kandalgaonkar

Raghuttam Sarvottam Bapardekar

Reshma Sarvottam Bapardekar

Pranil Prakash Bapardekar

Pallavi Prakash Bapardekar

Prdnya Prakash Bapardekar

Hemlata Pandurang Bapardekar @ Bhagyashri Ganesh Joshi

Pushpalata Panduran Bapardekar @ Saroj Pradipkumar Sarag

Kumudini Sunil Admane

Prakash Panduran Palekar

Shubhangi Damaji Nare @ Neha Umesh Fatak

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

02-04-2026

Arguments

11-03-2026

Arguments

04-02-2026

Arguments

07-01-2026

Evidence

27-11-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

04-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Civil Judge closed the evidence of defendants No.1 to 14 after they failed to appear on the scheduled date for adducing evidence despite repeated calling, and no application for adjournment was filed. The matter has been kept for the next stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Civil Judge closed the evidence of defendants No.1 to 14 after they failed to appear on the scheduled date for adducing evidence despite repeated calling, and no application for adjournment was filed. The matter has been kept for the next stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Devgad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case