Ashok Sahadev Vankar etc.4 vs Suresh Babu Kadam etc.20 Advocate - CHAVAN KRISHNA ANKUSH — 86/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O4,R1. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Steps_Unready Next hearing 09-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSI080009692023

e-Filing Number

02-11-2023

Filing Number

144/2023

Filing Date

02-Nov-2023

Registration No

86/2023

Registration Date

02-Nov-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kankavli

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O4,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Sahadev Vankar etc.4

    Adv. MALVANKAR GAYATRI DILIP

  2. 2.Vasudev Sahdev Vankar Poa Ashok Sahadev VankarRepresented by Power of Attorney -Ashok Sahadev Vankar

    Adv. MALVANKAR GAYATRI DILIP

  3. 3.Seema Ramachandra KadamRepresented by Guardian - Ashok Sahadev Vankar

    Adv. MALVANKAR GAYATRI DILIP

  4. 4.Manisha Siddharth KambleRepresented by Power of Attorney -Ashok Sahadev Vankar

    Adv. MALVANKAR GAYATRI DILIP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Babu Kadam etc.20 Advocate - CHAVAN KRISHNA ANKUSH

  2. 2.Prakash Babu Kadam

    Adv. CHAVAN KRISHNA ANKUSH

  3. 3.Ramesh Babu Kadam

    Adv. CHAVAN KRISHNA ANKUSH

  4. 4.Sunita Mangesh Tambe

  5. 5.Rajni Sujit Kadam

  6. 6.Mangala Ramakant Kadam

  7. 7.Vijaya Babu Kadam

    Adv. CHAVAN KRISHNA ANKUSH

  8. 8.Vishwas Krishna Kadam

    Adv. CHAVAN KRISHNA ANKUSH

  9. 9.Soma Anaji Kadam(Legal Heir)

  10. 10.Arvind Laxman Kasle

  11. 11.Vishwanath Laxman Kasale

  12. 12.Anand Narayan Kadam

  13. 13.Umesh Narayan Kadam

  14. 14.Sunita Sambhaji Tambe

  15. 15.Vaishali Vasudev Yadav

  16. 16.Sunita Narayan Kadam

  17. 17.Sunanda Govind Tambe(Legal Heir)

  18. 18.Sayali Satish Rane

  19. 19.Revansidha Baburao Karande

    Adv. PATADE VISHNU MAHADEV

  20. 20.Grampanchayat Belne Kh.

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Summary of Case 86/2023 - Civil Suit for Partition and Declaration Case Details Court: Civil Judge Junior Division, Kankavali, Sindhudurg District Case No.: RCS 13/2013 Decided: 12/06/2026 Judge: Shubham G. Laturiya Parties - Plaintiff: Yogesh Rajaram Pavaskar - Defendants: Bhau Ragho Pavaskar (D1), and Geetanjali Ganpat Kudtarkar, Manali Mangesh Visavekar, Madhavi Madhav Joshi, Shruti Mukund Mundale (D2-5) Key Facts The plaintiff sought partition of ancestral joint family properties in Wagheri village, alleging that Defendant No. 1 (his paternal uncle) obtained powers of attorney through fraud/misrepresentation in 2010-2011, then misused them to execute an unauthorized sale deed in January 2012 selling property Gat No. 1250 to Defendants 4-5 for ₹90,000. Issues & Findings Issue 1 - Fraud in Powers of Attorney: NO - Court found plaintiff failed to prove fraud, coercion, or misrepresentation. Plaintiff's own pleadings contradicted his cross-examination denial of signatures. No independent witnesses corroborated fraud allegations. Issue 2 - Authority for Sale Deed: NO - Powers of attorney were valid and subsisting on execution date. No fraud proven. The sale deed was executed within scope of authority conferred. Issue 3 - Obstruction of Possession: NO - Plaintiff failed to establish actual possession of property Gat No. 1250 or prove defendants obstructed it. Issue 4 - Bona Fide Purchasers: YES - Defendants 4-5 proved themselves bona fide purchasers for value without notice. Transaction executed on basis of subsisting valid powers of attorney with no evidence of notice of dispute. Issue 5 - Entitlement to Partition: YES - Plaintiff entitled to partition of Schedule 'A' properties (Gat Nos. 1211-1215), excluding Gat 1250 already sold. One-half share to plaintiff and Defendants 2-3; one-half to Defendant 1. Issue 6 - Declaration of Sale Deed Invalid: NO - Plaintiff failed to establish legal grounds to declare sale deed illegal or non-binding. Defendant 1 acted as valid attorney and sale was properly executed. Issue 7 - Perpetual Injunction: NO - No legal basis survived for injunction against Defendants 4-5 given validity of sale deed and plaintiff's failure to prove possession. Final Order The suit is partly decreed: - Plaintiff and Defendants 2-3 entitled to one-half share; Defendant 1 to one-half share in Schedule 'A' properties (Gat Nos. 1211-1215) - Preliminary decree for partition ordered - Prayer for declaration that sale deed is invalid REJECTED - Prayer for perpetual injunction against Defendants 4-5 REJECTED - Gat No. 1250 excluded from partition (governed by valid sale deed) - No order as to costs This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  12. 18-Jul-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  13. 18-Jul-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  14. 18-Jul-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  15. 18-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  16. 13-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  17. 26-Mar-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  18. 26-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  19. 19-Mar-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  20. 19-Mar-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  21. 19-Mar-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  22. 12-Mar-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  23. 12-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  24. 28-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  25. 21-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  26. 18-Feb-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  27. 18-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  28. 12-Feb-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  29. 07-Feb-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  30. 14-Jan-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  31. 14-Jan-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  32. 14-Jan-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  33. 20-Dec-2024

    Order on Exhibit

  34. 20-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  35. 22-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  36. 20-Aug-2024

    Order on Exhibit

  37. 20-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  38. 25-Jun-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  39. 30-Apr-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  40. 05-Mar-2024

    Order on Exhibit

  41. 05-Mar-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  42. 05-Jan-2024

    Order on Exhibit

  43. 05-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

  44. 02-Nov-2023

    Order on Exhibit

  45. 02-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 02-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 86/2023 - Civil Suit for Partition and Declaration Case Details Court: Civil Judge Junior Division, Kankavali, Sindhudurg District Case No.: RCS 13/2013 Decided: 12/06/2026 Judge: Shubham G. Laturiya Parties - Plaintiff: Yogesh Rajaram Pavaskar - Defendants: Bhau Ragho Pavaskar (D1), and Geetanjali Ganpat Kudtarkar, Manali Mangesh Visavekar, Madhavi Madhav Joshi, Shruti Mukund Mundale (D2-5) Key Facts The plaintiff sought partition of ancestral joint family properties in Wagheri village, alleging that Defendant No. 1 (his paternal uncle) obtained powers of attorney through fraud/misrepresentation in 2010-2011, then misused them to execute an unauthorized sale deed in January 2012 selling property Gat No. 1250 to Defendants 4-5 for ₹90,000. Issues & Findings Issue 1 - Fraud in Powers of Attorney: NO - Court found plaintiff failed to prove fraud, coercion, or misrepresentation. Plaintiff's own pleadings contradicted his cross-examination denial of signatures. No independent witnesses corroborated fraud allegations. Issue 2 - Authority for Sale Deed: NO - Powers of attorney were valid and subsisting on execution date. No fraud proven. The sale deed was executed within scope of authority conferred. Issue 3 - Obstruction of Possession: NO - Plaintiff failed to establish actual possession of property Gat No. 1250 or prove defendants obstructed it. Issue 4 - Bona Fide Purchasers: YES - Defendants 4-5 proved themselves bona fide purchasers for value without notice. Transaction executed on basis of subsisting valid powers of attorney with no evidence of notice of dispute. Issue 5 - Entitlement to Partition: YES - Plaintiff entitled to partition of Schedule 'A' properties (Gat Nos. 1211-1215), excluding Gat 1250 already sold. One-half share to plaintiff and Defendants 2-3; one-half to Defendant 1. Issue 6 - Declaration of Sale Deed Invalid: NO - Plaintiff failed to establish legal grounds to declare sale deed illegal or non-binding. Defendant 1 acted as valid attorney and sale was properly executed. Issue 7 - Perpetual Injunction: NO - No legal basis survived for injunction against Defendants 4-5 given validity of sale deed and plaintiff's failure to prove possession. Final Order The suit is partly decreed: - Plaintiff and Defendants 2-3 entitled to one-half share; Defendant 1 to one-half share in Schedule 'A' properties (Gat Nos. 1211-1215) - Preliminary decree for partition ordered - Prayer for declaration that sale deed is invalid REJECTED - Prayer for perpetual injunction against Defendants 4-5 REJECTED - Gat No. 1250 excluded from partition (governed by valid sale deed) - No order as to costs This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case