Shivam Gramin Bigar Sah Path Ltd Kank Through Manager vs Namrata Nandkumar Rane — 410/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Awaiting Summons Next hearing 15-Jul-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSI080007562025

e-Filing Number

09-09-2025

Filing Number

612/2025

Filing Date

09-Sep-2025

Registration No

410/2025

Registration Date

09-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kankavli

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

1.Shivam Gramin Bigar Sah Path Ltd Kank Through Manager

Adv. PARAB VILAS NARAYAN

Respondent(s)

1.Namrata Nandkumar Rane

Case History

15-Jul-2026

Next hearingPending
16-Apr-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary – SCC 410/2025 The court issued process and summons against respondent Namrata Nandkumar Rane for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found prima facie that all essential ingredients of the offence were made out: a cheque issued for a legally enforceable debt was dishonoured, and despite a statutory demand notice, the accused failed to pay within 15 days. The complainant was directed to pay process fees if not already paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
16-Apr-2026

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli
24-Mar-2026

Verification

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli
21-Jan-2026

Verification

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli
29-Oct-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
29-Oct-2025

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kankavli
09-Sep-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
09-Sep-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Sep-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 410/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary – SCC 410/2025 The court issued process and summons against respondent Namrata Nandkumar Rane for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found prima facie that all essential ingredients of the offence were made out: a cheque issued for a legally enforceable debt was dishonoured, and despite a statutory demand notice, the accused failed to pay within 15 days. The complainant was directed to pay process fees if not already paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.