Perpet Philip Rodrigues vs Mahesh Shashikant Surve — 62/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 210,303,305(B). Status: Verification. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHSI070005142025

Verification

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

360/2025

Filing Date

17-10-2025

Registration No

62/2025

Registration Date

17-10-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 210,303,305(B)

Petitioner(s)

Perpet Philip Rodrigues

Adv. PARADKAR SWAPNIL UDAY

Respondent(s)

Mahesh Shashikant Surve

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

21-04-2026

Verification

11-03-2026

Verification

04-02-2026

Verification

07-01-2026

Verification

19-11-2025

Verification

Interim Orders

17-10-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The petition filed by the complainant seeking directions to register an FIR for theft of a two-wheeler has been rejected. The court found that the complainant's current version (that the accused took the vehicle without permission) was contradictory to her earlier non-cognizable complaints to police, where she stated the accused had borrowed it temporarily and failed to return it. The court upheld the police classification of the offense as dishonest misappropriation under Section 314 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (a non-cognizable, bailable offense), holding no investigation direction was warranted. The matter has been posted for verification under Section 223 of the BNSS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by the complainant seeking directions to register an FIR for theft of a two-wheeler has been rejected. The court found that the complainant's current version (that the accused took the vehicle without permission) was contradictory to her earlier non-cognizable complaints to police, where she stated the accused had borrowed it temporarily and failed to return it. The court upheld the police classification of the offense as dishonest misappropriation under Section 314 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (a non-cognizable, bailable offense), holding no investigation direction was warranted. The matter has been posted for verification under Section 223 of the BNSS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case