Perpet Philip Rodrigues vs Mahesh Shashikant Surve — 62/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 210,303,305(B). Status: Verification. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSI070005142025
Filing Number
360/2025
Filing Date
17-Oct-2025
Registration No
62/2025
Registration Date
17-Oct-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Perpet Philip Rodrigues
Adv. PARADKAR SWAPNIL UDAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahesh Shashikant Surve
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
11-Mar-2026
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
04-Feb-2026
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
07-Jan-2026
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
19-Nov-2025
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
10-Nov-2025
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
17-Oct-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The petition filed by the complainant seeking directions to register an FIR for theft of a two-wheeler has been rejected. The court found that the complainant's current version (that the accused took the vehicle without permission) was contradictory to her earlier non-cognizable complaints to police, where she stated the accused had borrowed it temporarily and failed to return it. The court upheld the police classification of the offense as dishonest misappropriation under Section 314 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (a non-cognizable, bailable offense), holding no investigation direction was warranted. The matter has been posted for verification under Section 223 of the BNSS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 62/2025
Summary: The petition filed by the complainant seeking directions to register an FIR for theft of a two-wheeler has been rejected. The court found that the complainant's current version (that the accused took the vehicle without permission) was contradictory to her earlier non-cognizable complaints to police, where she stated the accused had borrowed it temporarily and failed to return it. The court upheld the police classification of the offense as dishonest misappropriation under Section 314 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (a non-cognizable, bailable offense), holding no investigation direction was warranted. The matter has been posted for verification under Section 223 of the BNSS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts