Tanuja Purushottam Bhogle vs Nagesh Balkrishna Bhogale Advocate - PALAV AMIT GANPAT — 107/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule3. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSI070004642025

e-Filing Number

30-09-2025

Filing Number

149/2025

Filing Date

30-Sep-2025

Registration No

107/2025

Registration Date

30-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule3

Petitioner(s)

1.Tanuja Purushottam Bhogle

Adv. PATKAR AVINASH SUDHAKAR

Respondent(s)

1.Nagesh Balkrishna Bhogale Advocate - PALAV AMIT GANPAT
2.Nishigandha Mohan Pujare

Case History

20-Jun-2026

Next hearingPending
16-Apr-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
11-Mar-2026

Order on T.I.View PDF

Summary: The plaintiff's applications for temporary prohibitory and mandatory injunctions (seeking to restrain defendant No.1 from interfering with her possession of ground floor portions and directing him to remove a lock he placed) were rejected. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience did not favor her, primarily because: (1) she did not seek mandatory injunction as a final relief in the suit; (2) she failed to include partition as a relief despite claiming the property is ancestral; and (3) Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act bars granting mere declarations without seeking all appropriate reliefs. Costs awarded to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
07-Mar-2026

Order on Exh

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
25-Feb-2026

Order on Exh

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
10-Feb-2026

Order on Exh

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
27-Jan-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
12-Jan-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
01-Jan-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
01-Jan-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
22-Dec-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
16-Dec-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
16-Dec-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
26-Nov-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
26-Nov-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
07-Oct-2025

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
30-Sep-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
30-Sep-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
30-Sep-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
30-Sep-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 107/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The plaintiff's applications for temporary prohibitory and mandatory injunctions (seeking to restrain defendant No.1 from interfering with her possession of ground floor portions and directing him to remove a lock he placed) were rejected. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience did not favor her, primarily because: (1) she did not seek mandatory injunction as a final relief in the suit; (2) she failed to include partition as a relief despite claiming the property is ancestral; and (3) Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act bars granting mere declarations without seeking all appropriate reliefs. Costs awarded to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.