Dilip Shridhar Aachrekar vs Prasad Anand Aachrekar Advocate - GAVANKAR SAMEER SURESH — 106/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER7RULE3. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI070004612025
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
19-09-2025
Filing Number
148/2025
Filing Date
26-09-2025
Registration No
106/2025
Registration Date
26-09-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dilip Shridhar Aachrekar
Adv. KULKARNI ULHAS BHALCHANDRA
Respondent(s)
Prasad Anand Aachrekar Advocate - GAVANKAR SAMEER SURESH
Shrikant Aanand Aachrekar
Aarti Aanand Achrekar
Priyanka Aanand Aachrekar
Nanda Aanand Aachrekar
Pournima Bhalchandra Aachrekar
Tanaya Kalpesh Hoigekar
Saroj Nishikant Aachrekar
Milind Nishikant Aachrekar
Geeta Mangesh Sawant Before Marriage Geeta Nishikant Aachrekar
Asawari Mandar Dalvi before marriage Asawari Nishikant Achrekar
Shital Deepak Aachrekar
Prajakta Deepak Achrekar
Suvarna Ketan Vagholkar
Asha Anil Aachrekar
Yogesh Anil Aachrekar
Mihir Anil Aachrekar
Nupura Hautmaki
Nitin Muralidhar Achrekar
Bharti Vijay Aachrekar
Siddharth Vijay Aachrekar
Avinash Muralidhar Aachrekar
Ranjana Ramesh Shirodkar before marriage Ranjana Muralidhar Achrekar
Ramchandra Harihar Aachrekar
Vijaya Umesh Tarkar
Ratan Narendra Kaul
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 11-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 20-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 21-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 14-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The plaintiff's application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to amend the partition suit by adding two inadvertently omitted ancestral properties was allowed. The court found the amendment to be formal in nature, causing no prejudice to defendants who raised no objection. The plaintiff must complete the amendment and provide a free amended copy of the plaint to defendants before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The plaintiff's application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to amend the partition suit by adding two inadvertently omitted ancestral properties was allowed. The court found the amendment to be formal in nature, causing no prejudice to defendants who raised no objection. The plaintiff must complete the amendment and provide a free amended copy of the plaint to defendants before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts