The State of Maharashtra through Malvan Police Station vs Satywan Gopal Patkar Advocate - BANDEKAR MADHAVI GAJANAN — 157/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSI070003592024

Filing Number

236/2024

Filing Date

17-Aug-2024

Registration No

157/2024

Registration Date

17-Aug-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

123

Police Station

Police Station Malvan

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra through Malvan Police Station

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Satywan Gopal Patkar Advocate - BANDEKAR MADHAVI GAJANAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Satyawan Gopal Patkar of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in evidence, including the absence of laboratory analysis reports confirming the seized bottles were alcohol, lack of independent witnesses to the seizure, and inconsistencies in prosecution testimony. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and released from bail obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  12. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  13. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  14. 08-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt Civil Judge Jd JMFC Malvan

  15. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt Civil Judge Jd JMFC Malvan

  16. 10-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt Civil Judge Jd JMFC Malvan

  17. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt Civil Judge Jd JMFC Malvan

  18. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt Civil Judge Jd JMFC Malvan

  19. 12-Mar-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  20. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt Civil Judge Jd JMFC Malvan

  21. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd JMFC Malvan

  22. 12-Feb-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Jt Civil Judge Jd JMFC Malvan

  23. 15-Jan-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  24. 04-Dec-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  25. 13-Nov-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  26. 18-Oct-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  27. 18-Sep-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  28. 17-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 17-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 157/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Satyawan Gopal Patkar of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in evidence, including the absence of laboratory analysis reports confirming the seized bottles were alcohol, lack of independent witnesses to the seizure, and inconsistencies in prosecution testimony. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and released from bail obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case