The State of Maharashtra through Malvan Police Station vs Satywan Gopal Patkar Advocate - BANDEKAR MADHAVI GAJANAN — 157/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI070003592024
Filing Number
236/2024
Filing Date
17-08-2024
Registration No
157/2024
Registration Date
17-08-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
123
Police Station
Police Station Malvan
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through Malvan Police Station
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Satywan Gopal Patkar Advocate - BANDEKAR MADHAVI GAJANAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 09-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Satyawan Gopal Patkar of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in evidence, including the absence of laboratory analysis reports confirming the seized bottles were alcohol, lack of independent witnesses to the seizure, and inconsistencies in prosecution testimony. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and released from bail obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Satyawan Gopal Patkar of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies in evidence, including the absence of laboratory analysis reports confirming the seized bottles were alcohol, lack of independent witnesses to the seizure, and inconsistencies in prosecution testimony. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and released from bail obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts