Jagdish Satyawan Naik vs Yestelin Fransis Farnandis etc. 3 Advocate - MAJGAONKAR GURUDAS RAGHUNATH — 62/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI070003362021
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
89/2021
Filing Date
15-07-2021
Registration No
62/2021
Registration Date
16-07-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jagdish Satyawan Naik
Adv. Mondkar Amruta Arvind
Respondent(s)
Yestelin Fransis Farnandis etc. 3 Advocate - MAJGAONKAR GURUDAS RAGHUNATH
Anton Hales Farnandis
Adv. PARKAR GANESH RAGHUNATH
Arvind Lakshman Dalvi
Adv. SAWANT PRADEEP BABAJI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 11-03-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 25-02-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 21-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 22-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court partly allowed Defendant No. 3's application seeking plaint rejection. The suit was found to be undervalued—the plaintiff valued it at ₹1,000 but should have valued it at ₹3,00,000 based on the contract consideration under Maharashtra Court Fees Act Section 6(ix)(a). However, instead of outright rejection, the plaintiff was granted one month to correct the valuation and pay requisite court fees; failure to do so will result in plaint rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court partly allowed Defendant No. 3's application seeking plaint rejection. The suit was found to be undervalued—the plaintiff valued it at ₹1,000 but should have valued it at ₹3,00,000 based on the contract consideration under Maharashtra Court Fees Act Section 6(ix)(a). However, instead of outright rejection, the plaintiff was granted one month to correct the valuation and pay requisite court fees; failure to do so will result in plaint rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts