Mahesh Keshav Parab vs Seetaram Satyawan Pavaskar Advocate - PAI SWAROOP NARAYAN — 60/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 15-Jul-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSI070002032022

Filing Number

137/2022

Filing Date

12-Apr-2022

Registration No

60/2022

Registration Date

12-Apr-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahesh Keshav Parab

    Adv. Ashapak Abdulrazak Shekha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Seetaram Satyawan Pavaskar Advocate - PAI SWAROOP NARAYAN

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  9. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  11. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  12. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  13. 21-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  14. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  15. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  16. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  17. 13-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  18. 24-Dec-2024

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary of Case 60/2022 Petitioner: Mahesh Keshav Parab Respondent: Seetaram Satyawan Pavaskar (Advocate Pai Swaroop Narayan) This case involves a complaint by Mahesh Parab against Seetaram Pavaskar regarding alleged non-payment of dues. The petitioner claimed he worked as a supervisor on a National Project scheme and that Pavaskar owed him ₹2,30,000, evidenced by two dishonored cheques. During cross-examination, Parab's testimony revealed significant inconsistencies and lack of documentary evidence—he couldn't produce government documents proving his employment, lacked details about the payment demand, and admitted the postal receipt for the notice served on the respondent was unavailable. The court found the complaint lacked credibility and proper substantiation, noting contradictions between the written complaint and oral testimony. Outcome: The case was dismissed; the complaint found to be baseless and improperly filed without requisite procedural compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 24-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  20. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  21. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  22. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  23. 05-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  24. 01-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  25. 30-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  26. 06-May-2024

    EvidenceView PDF

  27. 06-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  28. 30-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  29. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  30. 03-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  31. 02-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  32. 30-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  33. 16-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  34. 26-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  35. 25-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  36. 28-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  37. 25-May-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  38. 13-Apr-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  39. 21-Mar-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  40. 21-Mar-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  41. 22-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  42. 18-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  43. 09-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  44. 05-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  45. 04-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  46. 25-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  47. 12-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  48. 07-Jul-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  49. 29-Jun-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  50. 07-May-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  51. 19-Apr-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  52. 19-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  53. 12-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 12-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 60/2022 Petitioner: Mahesh Keshav Parab Respondent: Seetaram Satyawan Pavaskar (Advocate Pai Swaroop Narayan) This case involves a complaint by Mahesh Parab against Seetaram Pavaskar regarding alleged non-payment of dues. The petitioner claimed he worked as a supervisor on a National Project scheme and that Pavaskar owed him ₹2,30,000, evidenced by two dishonored cheques. During cross-examination, Parab's testimony revealed significant inconsistencies and lack of documentary evidence—he couldn't produce government documents proving his employment, lacked details about the payment demand, and admitted the postal receipt for the notice served on the respondent was unavailable. The court found the complaint lacked credibility and proper substantiation, noting contradictions between the written complaint and oral testimony. Outcome: The case was dismissed; the complaint found to be baseless and improperly filed without requisite procedural compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case