The State of Maharashtra through Achara Police Station vs Rajesh Dashrath Valave Advocate - KULKARNI ULHAS BHALCHANDRA — 77/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI070001812024
Filing Number
111/2024
Filing Date
16-04-2024
Registration No
77/2024
Registration Date
16-04-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
Police Station Achare
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through Achara Police Station
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Rajesh Dashrath Valave Advocate - KULKARNI ULHAS BHALCHANDRA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 13-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 31-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted accused Rajesh Dasharth Walle of all charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184, 196/146, 190(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish that the accused recklessly operated his motorcycle in a manner endangering human life or caused the injuries to the complainant and witnesses. Despite medical evidence of injuries, the court noted insufficient evidence directly linking the accused's negligent driving to the accident, finding contradictions in witness testimonies regarding the accident's circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted accused Rajesh Dasharth Walle of all charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and Motor Vehicles Act Section 184, 196/146, 190(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish that the accused recklessly operated his motorcycle in a manner endangering human life or caused the injuries to the complainant and witnesses. Despite medical evidence of injuries, the court noted insufficient evidence directly linking the accused's negligent driving to the accident, finding contradictions in witness testimonies regarding the accident's circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts