Pradip Shankar Naik vs Chetan Dattatray Naik Advocate - GAVANKAR SAMEER SURESH — 44/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R3. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 20th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI070001782023
e-Filing Number
22-03-2023
Filing Number
62/2023
Filing Date
23-Mar-2023
Registration No
44/2023
Registration Date
23-Mar-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pradip Shankar Naik
Adv. KULKARNI AMEY DATTAPRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chetan Dattatray Naik Advocate - GAVANKAR SAMEER SURESH
-
2.Anuradha Dattatray Naik
Case History
-
20-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
24-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
02-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
18-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
17-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
29-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
04-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
30-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
21-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jd JMFC Malvan
-
06-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jd JMFC Malvan
-
14-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
19-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
08-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
13-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
01-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
22-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
22-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
08-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
23-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
19-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
16-Sep-2023
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 44/2023 Outcome: The court rejected the defendants' application for temporary injunction. The judge found defendants failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss regarding their claimed "Versal Tradition" of alternating Ganpati festival expenses between family branches. Without documentary evidence supporting the tradition's existence and given the plaintiff's denial, the court held that granting the injunction risked misuse and violating the plaintiff's participation rights in jointly-celebrated festivals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
15-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
14-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
12-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
11-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
01-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
21-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
18-Jul-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
06-Jun-2023
Ex-Parte Order
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
29-Apr-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
-
23-Mar-2023
Order on T.I.View PDF
-
23-Mar-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
23-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 44/2023
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 44/2023 Outcome: The court rejected the defendants' application for temporary injunction. The judge found defendants failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss regarding their claimed "Versal Tradition" of alternating Ganpati festival expenses between family branches. Without documentary evidence supporting the tradition's existence and given the plaintiff's denial, the court held that granting the injunction risked misuse and violating the plaintiff's participation rights in jointly-celebrated festivals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts