The State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Office, Kudal No. 3 vs Irmit Remet Ludrik Advocate - MONDKAR RASHMI ANANT — 64/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSI070001692025

Filing Number

115/2025

Filing Date

24-Apr-2025

Registration No

64/2025

Registration Date

24-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

Excise Office Kudal

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Office, Kudal No. 3

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Irmit Remet Ludrik Advocate - MONDKAR RASHMI ANANT

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary: In Summary Criminal Case No. 64/2025 (Maharashtra State v. Irmit), the court examined charges related to illegal liquor manufacturing and sale. The prosecution witness testified about a raid on January 21, 2025, where 32 sealed bottles of National Royal brand liquor (180ml each) were seized from the accused's premises in Debag Santakruzwadi. The defense cross-examination exposed significant procedural irregularities, including lack of property verification, absence of local panchas, missing vehicle details, and no separate documentation of seized samples. The court ultimately dismissed the case due to substantial procedural defects and insufficient evidence corroboration, finding the investigation lacking in credibility and proper legal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  10. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  11. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  12. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  13. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  14. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  15. 19-Jun-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

  16. 24-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 24-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Summary Criminal Case No. 64/2025 (Maharashtra State v. Irmit), the court examined charges related to illegal liquor manufacturing and sale. The prosecution witness testified about a raid on January 21, 2025, where 32 sealed bottles of National Royal brand liquor (180ml each) were seized from the accused's premises in Debag Santakruzwadi. The defense cross-examination exposed significant procedural irregularities, including lack of property verification, absence of local panchas, missing vehicle details, and no separate documentation of seized samples. The court ultimately dismissed the case due to substantial procedural defects and insufficient evidence corroboration, finding the investigation lacking in credibility and proper legal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case