The State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Office, Kudal No. 3 vs Prakash Manohar Salkar Advocate - GOVEKAR HEMENDRA LAXMAN — 62/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI070001672025
Next Hearing
21st May 2026
Filing Number
113/2025
Filing Date
24-04-2025
Registration No
62/2025
Registration Date
24-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
Excise Office Kudal
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Office, Kudal No. 3
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Prakash Manohar Salkar Advocate - GOVEKAR HEMENDRA LAXMAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary In Summary Criminal Case No. 62/2025 (Maharashtra State v. Prakash), the court examined witness testimony regarding the seizure of 42 sealed bottles of Bob's Lemon Vodka (180ml each) from an illegal liquor operation on 09/01/2025. The cross-examination revealed procedural lapses including failure to verify property documents, use of panchs from distant locations (25-40 km away), and lack of separate panchnama for samples. The court accepted the examination-in-chief and cross-examination, with further examination declined. The matter was listed for hearing completion on 10-12-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Summary Criminal Case No. 62/2025 (Maharashtra State v. Prakash), the court examined witness testimony regarding the seizure of 42 sealed bottles of Bob's Lemon Vodka (180ml each) from an illegal liquor operation on 09/01/2025. The cross-examination revealed procedural lapses including failure to verify property documents, use of panchs from distant locations (25-40 km away), and lack of separate panchnama for samples. The court accepted the examination-in-chief and cross-examination, with further examination declined. The matter was listed for hearing completion on 10-12-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts