The State of Maharashtra through Malvan Police Station vs Shubham Vilas Bandekar etc. — 14/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),351(2),352,3(5). Status: Judgment. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI070001222025
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
76/2025
Filing Date
28-03-2025
Registration No
14/2025
Registration Date
28-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
Police Station Malvan
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through Malvan Police Station
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Shubham Vilas Bandekar etc.
Akshay Dashrath Bhagat
Lalit Dashrath Bhagat
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
The court examined the prosecution witness and counter-examined the defense witness in Criminal Case No. 14/2025. The defense successfully challenged the prosecution's evidence regarding the weapon (wooden stick) recovery, the police investigation procedure, and the complainant's credibility, with the defense witness testifying that key details in the complaint were inconsistent with police findings. The counter-examination was completed, and no further examination was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court examined the prosecution witness and counter-examined the defense witness in Criminal Case No. 14/2025. The defense successfully challenged the prosecution's evidence regarding the weapon (wooden stick) recovery, the police investigation procedure, and the complainant's credibility, with the defense witness testifying that key details in the complaint were inconsistent with police findings. The counter-examination was completed, and no further examination was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts