Chandrashekhar Suryakant Morvekar vs Bhushan Shivaji Satam Advocate - TARWADKAR HARSHAD PRABHAKAR — 31/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI070001162017
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
Filing Number
73/2017
Filing Date
27-03-2017
Registration No
31/2017
Registration Date
27-03-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrashekhar Suryakant Morvekar
Adv. GAVANKAR SAMEER SURESH
Respondent(s)
Bhushan Shivaji Satam Advocate - TARWADKAR HARSHAD PRABHAKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a cross-examination order in a criminal case (CNR No. 07-000662-2017) involving Tulshidas vs. Mohammad before the First Class Judicial Magistrate, Malvan, dated 13/01/2025. The witness (Witness No. 02 for the complainant) was cross-examined regarding fish trading transactions, with the accused's counsel questioning inconsistencies in the witness's affidavit regarding specific dates, quantities, and types of fish allegedly supplied between 07/08/2017 and 20/08/2017. The cross-examination was completed without further examination requested, and the witness's statement was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a cross-examination order in a criminal case (CNR No. 07-000662-2017) involving Tulshidas vs. Mohammad before the First Class Judicial Magistrate, Malvan, dated 13/01/2025. The witness (Witness No. 02 for the complainant) was cross-examined regarding fish trading transactions, with the accused's counsel questioning inconsistencies in the witness's affidavit regarding specific dates, quantities, and types of fish allegedly supplied between 07/08/2017 and 20/08/2017. The cross-examination was completed without further examination requested, and the witness's statement was recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts