Ganesh Nareshwar Vengurlekar vs Anand Bala Bambardekar Advocate - Mondkar Amruta Arvind — 700014/2013

Case under Ia/1/2021 Classification : Taking Lrs on Record Section Ganesh Nareshwar VengurlekarAnand Bala Bambardekar. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSI070000492013

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

03rd July 2026

Filing Number

700014/2013

Filing Date

24-01-2013

Registration No

700014/2013

Registration Date

24-01-2013

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

Acts & Sections

Ia/1/2021 Classification : Taking Lrs on Record Section Ganesh Nareshwar VengurlekarAnand Bala Bambardekar
Ia/2/2021 Classification : Amendment of the Pleadings Section Ganesh Nareshwar VengurlekarAnand Bala Bambardekar
Ia/3/2022 Classification : Condonation of Delay in Taking Lrs on Record Section Ganesh Nareshwar VengurlekarBhalchandra mayekar
Ia/4/2022 Classification : Taking Lrs on Record Section Ganesh Nareshwar VengurlekarBhalchandra Jagnnath Mayekar
Ia/5/2024 Classification : Amendment of the Pleadings Section Ganesh Nareshwar VengurlekarGanesh Shridhar Vengurlekar
Ia/6/2024 Classification : Amendment of the Pleadings Section Ganesh Nareshwar VengurlekarKiran Bala Bambardekar
Ia/7/2024 Classification : Amendment of the Pleadings Section Ganesh Nareshwar VengurlekarGanesh Shridhar Vengurlekar
Ia/8/2024 Classification : Setting Aside Abatement Section Ganesh Nareshwar VengurlekarGanesh Shridhar Vengurlekar

Petitioner(s)

Ganesh Nareshwar Vengurlekar

Adv. GAVANKAR SAMEER SURESH

Respondent(s)

Anand Bala Bambardekar Advocate - Mondkar Amruta Arvind

Kiran Bala Bambardekar

Adv. V.N.Parab, L.R.Kubal

Sou. Shilpa Shankar Pednekar

Adv. PARAB VILAS NARAYAN

Ganesh Shridhar Vengurlekar(Legal Heir)

Adv. PARAB VILAS NARAYAN

Mahadev Ramchandra Bambardekar

Adv. H.P.Tarvadkar

Manohar sadanand Hindlekar

Adv. PAI SWAROOP NARAYAN

Shridhar Sadanand Hindlekar

Dipika Dipak Adarkar

Vanita Ramchandra Parab

Mansi Mahendra Mungekar

Govind Sitaram Mayekar

Sunita Vishwnath Ajgaonkar

Adv. exparty

Smita Shridhar Kuralkar

Asha Bala Bambardekar

Adv. exparty

Sudhakar Shridhar Vengurlekar

Adv. exparty

Suresh Shridhar Vengurlekar

Adv. exparty

Vijay Shridhar Vengurlekar(Legal Heir)

Adv. exparty

Ramesh Shridhar Vengurlekar

Adv. exparty

Pradeep Shridhar Vengurlekar

Adv. exparty

Vina Vijay Kerkar

Shamika Shashikant Gavande

Bhalchandra Jagnnath Mayekar(Legal Heir)

Narayan Jagannath Mayekar

Adv. PAI SWAROOP NARAYAN

Lila @ Sumitra Dashrath Kambli

Snehlata Jagnnath Mayekar

Adv. exparty

Rajendrakumar Maruti Zad

Adv. exparty

Gurudas Dhondi Gosavi

Adv. exparty

Shubhangi Prakash Kochrekar

Adv. exparty

Harshad Prakash Kochrekar

Adv. exparty

Suchita Tukaram Govekar

Adv. exparty

Suhasini Suhas Khule

Santosh Ramchandra Talgaonkar

Dattaram Shankar Zad

Adv. exparty

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

17-04-2026

Awaiting Summons

11-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

16-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

03-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

19-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

06-07-2015
Order on T.I.
30-01-2016
Issues
10-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary The plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected. The court found that the proposed amendments to paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 5 would fundamentally change the nature of the suit by removing defendant no. 5's land from the suit way claim, thereby causing prejudice to the defendants despite being filed six years after the written statements and court commissioner's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected. The court found that the proposed amendments to paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 5 would fundamentally change the nature of the suit by removing defendant no. 5's land from the suit way claim, thereby causing prejudice to the defendants despite being filed six years after the written statements and court commissioner's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case