Dattatray Krushnaji Angane etc. 2 vs Sajay Mahadev Chavan etc. 8 Advocate - PARULEKAR RUPESH KESHAV — 700014/2012
Case under Ia/1/2019 Classification : Produce Document / Property Section Dattatray Krushnaji Angane etc. 2Sajay Mahadev Chavan etc. 8. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI070000362012
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
Filing Number
700014/2012
Filing Date
01-02-2012
Registration No
700014/2012
Registration Date
03-02-2012
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattatray Krushnaji Angane etc. 2
Adv. DHAMAPURKAR SATISHKUMAR VISHRAM
Suresh Shridhar Angane
Adv. DHAMAPURKAR SATISHKUMAR VISHRAM
Respondent(s)
Sajay Mahadev Chavan etc. 8 Advocate - PARULEKAR RUPESH KESHAV
Sou. Shobha Sanjay Chavan
Adv. PARULEKAR RUPESH KESHAV
Smt. Vaishali Bhaskar Angane
Adv. Exparte
Hemant Ramesh Angane
Adv. GEERSAGAR SUDARSHAN SHRIPAD
Manish Ramesh Angane
Adv. GEERSAGAR SUDARSHAN SHRIPAD
Dinesh Remesh Angane
Adv. GEERSAGAR SUDARSHAN SHRIPAD
Umesh Sakharam Angane Deceased(Legal Heir)
Adv. GEERSAGAR SUDARSHAN SHRIPAD7.
Urmila Umesh Angane
Adv. exparty
Smt. Sadhana Ramesh Angane
Adv. GEERSAGAR SUDARSHAN SHRIPAD
Sunil Aabaji Sawant
Mahesh Aabaji Sawant
Mohan Aabaji Sawant
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 11-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 16-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 26-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 30-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application to add proposed defendants 9 to 11 (legal representatives of deceased Wanmala Abaji Sawant) as necessary parties to the suit for declaration, injunction, and possession was allowed. The court found them to be necessary parties despite the plaintiff's earlier omission and the filing of evidence affidavits, as their presence is essential for final adjudication of the property dispute. The plaintiff is directed to add them subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1,000 to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application to add proposed defendants 9 to 11 (legal representatives of deceased Wanmala Abaji Sawant) as necessary parties to the suit for declaration, injunction, and possession was allowed. The court found them to be necessary parties despite the plaintiff's earlier omission and the filing of evidence affidavits, as their presence is essential for final adjudication of the property dispute. The plaintiff is directed to add them subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1,000 to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts