Sukhada Rohan Kode Before Marriage Sukhada Motiram Parkar vs The State Of Maharashtra through Police InspectorAchara Police Station — 6/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSI070000262026
e-Filing Number
07-01-2026
Filing Number
22/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sukhada Rohan Kode Before Marriage Sukhada Motiram Parkar
Adv. KULKARNI AMEY DATTAPRASAD
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra through Police InspectorAchara Police Station
Amol Amrut Kadam
Adv. GOVEKAR HEMENDRA LAXMAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 01-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 30-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 27-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the applicant's application seeking return of ₹6,00,000 that was frozen during a cyber crime investigation. The court found that the dispute was a civil matter arising from a land transaction rather than cyber fraud, noting the applicant concealed material facts, made a voluntary RTGS transfer with a 3-4 day delay before filing the cyber complaint, and WhatsApp chats evidenced willing participation in the transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court rejected the applicant's application seeking return of ₹6,00,000 that was frozen during a cyber crime investigation. The court found that the dispute was a civil matter arising from a land transaction rather than cyber fraud, noting the applicant concealed material facts, made a voluntary RTGS transfer with a 3-4 day delay before filing the cyber complaint, and WhatsApp chats evidenced willing participation in the transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts