The State of Maharashtra Through Malvan Police Station vs Yogesh Satyavan Pawar — 2/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSI070000122025

Case disposed

Filing Number

6/2025

Filing Date

10-01-2025

Registration No

2/2025

Registration Date

10-01-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

201

Police Station

Police Station Malvan

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through Malvan Police Station

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Yogesh Satyavan Pawar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malvan

25-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Arguments

11-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

25-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

21-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused Yogesh Satyavan Pwar under Section 12-A of the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient and defective. The court noted critical gaps in the investigation—including the absence of the investigating officer's testimony and conflicting witness statements—which failed to establish that the accused was engaged in illegal gambling or collecting money for the "Mumbai Matka" betting operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

25-02-2026
Evidence
11-03-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Yogesh Satyavan Pwar under Section 12-A of the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient and defective. The court noted critical gaps in the investigation—including the absence of the investigating officer's testimony and conflicting witness statements—which failed to establish that the accused was engaged in illegal gambling or collecting money for the "Mumbai Matka" betting operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malvan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case