State of Maharashtra vs Sanket Ratnakar Mali — 559/2022

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65A,E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSI060010792022

Case disposed

Filing Number

869/2022

Filing Date

29-11-2022

Registration No

559/2022

Registration Date

29-11-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

110

Police Station

Police Station Sawantwadi.

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65A,E

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Sanket Ratnakar Mali

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-12-2025

Order on Exh

07-11-2025

Order on Exh

25-08-2025

Order on Exh

11-07-2025

Order on Exh

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(a)(e) offense) against accused Sanket, who remained absent despite warrant issuance since the case's inception. The court found police negligence in securing the accused's presence made normal trial impossible, citing precedent that Section 258 applies in such circumstances. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arrest, while bail bonds are cancelled, seized liquor forfeited to Excise Department, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(a)(e) offense) against accused Sanket, who remained absent despite warrant issuance since the case's inception. The court found police negligence in securing the accused's presence made normal trial impossible, citing precedent that Section 258 applies in such circumstances. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arrest, while bail bonds are cancelled, seized liquor forfeited to Excise Department, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case