State of Maharashtra vs Sanket Ratnakar Mali — 559/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65A,E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI060010792022
Filing Number
869/2022
Filing Date
29-11-2022
Registration No
559/2022
Registration Date
29-11-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
110
Police Station
Police Station Sawantwadi.
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Sanket Ratnakar Mali
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-12-2025 | Order on Exh |
| 07-11-2025 | Order on Exh |
| 25-08-2025 | Order on Exh |
| 11-07-2025 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(a)(e) offense) against accused Sanket, who remained absent despite warrant issuance since the case's inception. The court found police negligence in securing the accused's presence made normal trial impossible, citing precedent that Section 258 applies in such circumstances. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arrest, while bail bonds are cancelled, seized liquor forfeited to Excise Department, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(a)(e) offense) against accused Sanket, who remained absent despite warrant issuance since the case's inception. The court found police negligence in securing the accused's presence made normal trial impossible, citing precedent that Section 258 applies in such circumstances. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon arrest, while bail bonds are cancelled, seized liquor forfeited to Excise Department, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts