Ramesh Nagesh Bhat etc. 3 vs Shivprasad Keshav Korgaonkar Advocate - NIRWADEKAR ANIL KRISHNA — 99/2021
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act Section 15,16. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 24th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI060006012021
Filing Number
258/2021
Filing Date
29-Jul-2021
Registration No
99/2021
Registration Date
04-Aug-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramesh Nagesh Bhat etc. 3
Adv. AMBIYE RAMNATH DATTARAM
-
2.Prashant Nagesh Bhat POA Ramesh Nagesh Bhat
-
3.Gita Dattaram Bandekar POA Ramesh Nagesh Bhat
-
4.Smita Chandrabhan Pednekar POA Ramesh Nagesh Bhat
-
5.Asha Keshav Mahajan POA Ramesh Nagesh Bhat
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shivprasad Keshav Korgaonkar Advocate - NIRWADEKAR ANIL KRISHNA
Case History
-
24-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
20-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Ramesh Nagesh Bhat v. Shivprasad Keshav Korgaonkar (99/2021) Outcome: The plaintiff's application for rent deposit under Order XV-A of the CPC was rejected. The court found that ownership of the property is disputed and under litigation—the plaintiff's claim to be the lessor cannot be established at this preliminary stage. Since the landlord-tenant relationship itself is a contested fact requiring merit-based determination, no interim rent deposit order could be issued. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
17-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
18-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
24-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
11-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
11-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
17-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
28-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
19-Dec-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
21-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
23-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
15-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
20-Feb-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
15-Jan-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
27-Nov-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
17-Oct-2023
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
16-Aug-2023
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
20-Jun-2023
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
11-Apr-2023
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
15-Mar-2023
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
17-Jan-2023
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
19-Oct-2022
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
14-Sep-2022
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
12-Jul-2022
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
13-Apr-2022
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
18-Feb-2022
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
14-Dec-2021
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
12-Nov-2021
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
22-Sep-2021
Unready Board
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
04-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 99/2021
Case Summary: Ramesh Nagesh Bhat v. Shivprasad Keshav Korgaonkar (99/2021) Outcome: The plaintiff's application for rent deposit under Order XV-A of the CPC was rejected. The court found that ownership of the property is disputed and under litigation—the plaintiff's claim to be the lessor cannot be established at this preliminary stage. Since the landlord-tenant relationship itself is a contested fact requiring merit-based determination, no interim rent deposit order could be issued. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts