Vithu Krishna Rawool vs Nalini Jaywant Parab etc 9 Advocate - DEUSKAR AMIT SHRIKRUSHNA — 84/2018

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSI060005282018

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

109/2018

Filing Date

31-07-2018

Registration No

84/2018

Registration Date

01-08-2018

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 39

Petitioner(s)

Vithu Krishna Rawool

Adv. RANE SANDESH AMRUT

Respondent(s)

Nalini Jaywant Parab etc 9 Advocate - DEUSKAR AMIT SHRIKRUSHNA

Vaibhav Jaywant Parab

Meena Anand Parab Before Marriage Meena Jaywant Parab

Shivani Subhash Tilave Before Marriage Shila Jaywant Parab

Kashi Narayan Parab Before Marriage Bharti Jaywant Parab

Deepa @ Dipali Sameer Patil Before Marriage Dipali Jaywant Parab

Anusaya Krishna Parab

Nasir Ajamoddin Yakub Gawandi

Hussen Yakub Batavle

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi

11-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

11-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

28-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

07-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

21-11-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

14-02-2020
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition under Rule 31 to file an affidavit without written certificate. The plaintiff, an 85-year-old, was permitted to submit written arguments without formal affidavit due to age and health considerations. The defendants (Respondents 7, 8, and 9) were directed to file their written arguments by 14.02.2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's petition under Rule 31 to file an affidavit without written certificate. The plaintiff, an 85-year-old, was permitted to submit written arguments without formal affidavit due to age and health considerations. The defendants (Respondents 7, 8, and 9) were directed to file their written arguments by 14.02.2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case