State of Maharashtra vs Mithilesh KUmar Giri — 266/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI060004772023
Filing Number
394/2023
Filing Date
24-05-2023
Registration No
266/2023
Registration Date
24-05-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
76
Police Station
Police Station Sawantwadi.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Mithilesh KUmar Giri
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 03-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 02-06-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-03-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court ordered the proceedings stopped under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a liquor prohibition case against Mithilesh, citing the accused's continuous absence since inception despite summons, making normal trial impossible. The prosecution retains liberty to revive the case upon the accused's arrest or appearance with justifiable grounds; meanwhile, bail bonds are cancelled, seized liquor forfeited to the Excise Department, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court ordered the proceedings stopped under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a liquor prohibition case against Mithilesh, citing the accused's continuous absence since inception despite summons, making normal trial impossible. The prosecution retains liberty to revive the case upon the accused's arrest or appearance with justifiable grounds; meanwhile, bail bonds are cancelled, seized liquor forfeited to the Excise Department, and case records retained for potential reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts