Pavitra Pandurang Gawade BM Vasanti Dattaram Gawade vs Anand Dattaram Gawade — 37/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34, 38. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSI060003012026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

69/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34, 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pavitra Pandurang Gawade BM Vasanti Dattaram Gawade

    Adv. ADV. GAWAS RATNAKAR KRISHNA

  2. 2.Saraswati Dattaram Gawade

    Adv. ADV. GAWAS RATNAKAR KRISHNA

  3. 3.Aishwarya Eknath Gavas BM Jaywanti Dattaram Gawade

    Adv. ADV. GAWAS RATNAKAR KRISHNA

  4. 4.Archita Ashok Bhirmole BM Daya Dattaram Gawade

    Adv. ADV. GAWAS RATNAKAR KRISHNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anand Dattaram Gawade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Lok Adalat disposed of Civil Suit No. 37/2026 between Pavitra and others v/s. Anand after the parties amicably settled the matter and filed a joint compromise deed (Exh.18). A compromise decree was drawn up incorporating the settlement terms, court fees were refunded to the plaintiff, and the proceedings were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalat disposed of Civil Suit No. 37/2026 between Pavitra and others v/s. Anand after the parties amicably settled the matter and filed a joint compromise deed (Exh.18). A compromise decree was drawn up incorporating the settlement terms, court fees were refunded to the plaintiff, and the proceedings were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case