Ashwini Vijay Kondekar vs State of Maharashtra through Inspector, State Excise, Check Post, Insuli — 60/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSI060002892026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
228/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
60/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Last updated 20-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
04
Police Station
Police Station Sawantwadi.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashwini Vijay Kondekar
Adv. CHAVAN PARSHURAM BABURAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through Inspector, State Excise, Check Post, Insuli
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed Ashwini's application for interim custody of her seized TVS Jupiter ZX vehicle under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. The vehicle, seized in relation to Maharashtra Prohibition Act violations, was ordered to be released to the applicant upon execution of a Rs. 1,00,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that she cooperate with investigations, not sell or modify the vehicle, and produce it as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
11-Mar-2026
Unready Board
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 60/2026
The court allowed Ashwini's application for interim custody of her seized TVS Jupiter ZX vehicle under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. The vehicle, seized in relation to Maharashtra Prohibition Act violations, was ordered to be released to the applicant upon execution of a Rs. 1,00,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that she cooperate with investigations, not sell or modify the vehicle, and produce it as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts