ARUN PANDURANG GAWADE vs State of Maharashtra through Inspector, Sawantwadi Police Station — 56/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 30th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSI060002832026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
223/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
56/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Last updated 20-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
29
Police Station
Police Station Sawantwadi.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARUN PANDURANG GAWADE
Adv. JADHAV POOJA VIKAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through Inspector, Sawantwadi Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court approved the petitioner Arun Pandu's application to retrieve his two seized cattle from police custody, provided he deposits a security bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and pays Rs. 200 daily to the shelter for the animals' maintenance until he takes physical possession. The court found that since the petitioner purchased the cattle for agricultural purposes and the investigation would take considerable time, releasing the animals under specified conditions with proper safeguards was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
25-Mar-2026
Unready Board
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
17-Mar-2026
Unready Board
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
11-Mar-2026
Unready Board
Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2026
The court approved the petitioner Arun Pandu's application to retrieve his two seized cattle from police custody, provided he deposits a security bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and pays Rs. 200 daily to the shelter for the animals' maintenance until he takes physical possession. The court found that since the petitioner purchased the cattle for agricultural purposes and the investigation would take considerable time, releasing the animals under specified conditions with proper safeguards was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts