Shalaka Sadashiv Gaonkar vs State of Maharashtra,Inspector, State Excise, — 52/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 11th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHSI060002552026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

197/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

52/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

FIR Details

FIR Number

07

Police Station

Police Station Sawantwadi.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Shalaka Sadashiv Gaonkar

Adv. CHAVAN PARSHURAM BABURAO

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra,Inspector, State Excise,

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi

11-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Unready Board

04-03-2026

Unready Board

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed Shalaka's application for interim custody of a seized Hyundai Santro car under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, finding her to be the legitimate owner with valid documentation. The vehicle is released on an Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond with conditions including cooperation with investigation, prohibition on selling or altering the vehicle, and production of photographs—citing Supreme Court precedent that seized properties should not remain idle at police facilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Shalaka's application for interim custody of a seized Hyundai Santro car under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, finding her to be the legitimate owner with valid documentation. The vehicle is released on an Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond with conditions including cooperation with investigation, prohibition on selling or altering the vehicle, and production of photographs—citing Supreme Court precedent that seized properties should not remain idle at police facilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case