KANTILAL BECHARDAS PARMAR THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY ARVIND TUKARAM MHADESHWAR vs State of Maharashtra through Inspector, Banda Police Station — 40/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 28th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSI060001702026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
127/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
Police Station Banda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANTILAL BECHARDAS PARMAR THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY ARVIND TUKARAM MHADESHWAR
Adv. चव्हाण कृष्णा
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through Inspector, Banda Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Disposed
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
Unready Board
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | Unready Board |
| 07-04-2026 | Unready Board |
| 31-03-2026 | Unready Board |
| 27-03-2026 | Unready Board |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Kantilal's application for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki A Star vehicle (Crime No. 11/2026 under Maharashtra Prohibition Act and Motor Vehicle Act), finding that as the vehicle's owner willing to comply with court conditions, there was no purpose in keeping it idle at the police station where it could deteriorate. The court ordered release of the vehicle upon execution of a Rs. 6,00,000 indemnity bond with conditions that the applicant cooperate with investigation, refrain from selling/transferring the vehicle, and maintain its original condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed Kantilal's application for interim custody of his seized Maruti Suzuki A Star vehicle (Crime No. 11/2026 under Maharashtra Prohibition Act and Motor Vehicle Act), finding that as the vehicle's owner willing to comply with court conditions, there was no purpose in keeping it idle at the police station where it could deteriorate. The court ordered release of the vehicle upon execution of a Rs. 6,00,000 indemnity bond with conditions that the applicant cooperate with investigation, refrain from selling/transferring the vehicle, and maintain its original condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts