Ramakant Masurkar vs Satish Dubhashi -Deceased etc.2 Advocate - NIMBALKAR SANDIP SAMBHAJIRAO1. — 600104/2005
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 54. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI060001342003
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
600104/2005
Filing Date
15-09-2005
Registration No
600104/2005
Registration Date
20-09-2005
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramakant Masurkar
Adv. AMBIYE RAMNATH DATTARAM
Respondent(s)
Satish Dubhashi -Deceased etc.2 Advocate - NIMBALKAR SANDIP SAMBHAJIRAO1.
Seema Dubhashi 1.
Sameer Dubhashi 1.
Siddhesh Dubhashi 1.
Kashinath @ Babalya Dubhashi
Kamalabai Kashinath Dubhashi Deceased
Adv. NIMBALKAR SANDIP SAMBHAJIRAO2.
Pushkaraj Dubhashi(Legal Heir) 2.
Savita Kuvelkar 2.
Mangala Priyolkar 2.
Surekha Kakulo
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 31-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-12-2025 | Arguments |
| 14-11-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary This is a civil suit (Case No. 104/2005) heard before the Savantwadi Taluka Court regarding a land dispute. The court completed examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witnesses concerning the authenticity of a notice dated 01/07/2002, with disputes over original versus photocopied documents. The court found the witness testimony and documentary evidence acceptable, and the case proceeded to arguments concluding on 11/03/2024 with the order reserved for judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary This is a civil suit (Case No. 104/2005) heard before the Savantwadi Taluka Court regarding a land dispute. The court completed examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witnesses concerning the authenticity of a notice dated 01/07/2002, with disputes over original versus photocopied documents. The court found the witness testimony and documentary evidence acceptable, and the case proceeded to arguments concluding on 11/03/2024 with the order reserved for judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts