State of Maharashtra vs John Thomas Desouzha etc. — 39/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65A,E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSI060000762024
Filing Number
62/2024
Filing Date
23-01-2024
Registration No
39/2024
Registration Date
23-01-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sawantwadi
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
State Excise Dept.Insuli Sawantwadi
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
John Thomas Desouzha etc.
Mangesh Manohar Bhaidkar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Sawantwadi
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 11-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 21-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 28-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against accused John Thomas D'souza and Mangesh Manohar Bhaidkar in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, citing the accused's non-appearance, absence of a required Chargeability Report (C.A. report) filed over six months late, and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence. The accused were discharged with liberty for the prosecution to revive proceedings upon arrest or securing their presence with justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against accused John Thomas D'souza and Mangesh Manohar Bhaidkar in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, citing the accused's non-appearance, absence of a required Chargeability Report (C.A. report) filed over six months late, and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence. The accused were discharged with liberty for the prosecution to revive proceedings upon arrest or securing their presence with justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts