Gangaram Shantaram Rawool vs Nagesh Aaba Rawool Advocate - AMBIYE RAMNATH DATTARAM — 69/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1,2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI050006142021
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
156/2021
Filing Date
20-11-2021
Registration No
69/2021
Registration Date
20-11-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Vengurla
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gangaram Shantaram Rawool
Adv. Kiran R. Paradkar
Respondent(s)
Nagesh Aaba Rawool Advocate - AMBIYE RAMNATH DATTARAM
Vasudha Aaba Rawool
Adv. AMBIYE RAMNATH DATTARAM
Manjari Mahadev Chavhatekar Before Marriage Manjiri Aaba Rawool
Sidhi Sandip Mulik Before Marriage Sidhi Suresh Rawool
Sidhesh suresh rawool
Sunita suresh Rawool
Adv. AMBIYE RAMNATH DATTARAM
Prathmesh Suresh Rawool
Adv. AMBIYE RAMNATH DATTARAM
Anapurna Gopal Rawool
Vishvnath Mahadev Rawool
Mohan Mahadev Rawool
Chandu Mahadev Rawool
Pradip Gajajan Rawool
Sham Gajanan Rawool
Adv. AMBIYE RAMNATH DATTARAM
Savitari Gajanan Rawool
Jayashri Jaysing Rawool
Jivan Jayasing Rawool
Jotsana Jayasing Rawool
Dipali Ramchandra Parab
Darshan Ramchandra Parab
Lakshumi Mohan Parab
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 11-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 14-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed defendant No. 1's application subject to costs of Rs. 500, which must be paid by the plaintiff on or before the next date. The previous "no say" order dated 14/09/2022 was set aside, and the plaintiff is now permitted to file his response to the application (Exh.33) after paying the costs, subject to penalty of vacation of this order upon default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed defendant No. 1's application subject to costs of Rs. 500, which must be paid by the plaintiff on or before the next date. The previous "no say" order dated 14/09/2022 was set aside, and the plaintiff is now permitted to file his response to the application (Exh.33) after paying the costs, subject to penalty of vacation of this order upon default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts