Rohit Sunil Mhaplankar vs Grampanchayat Parulebajar Through Sarpanch Grampanchyat Parule Advocate - Kiran R. Paradkar — 64/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI050004642022
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
144/2022
Filing Date
03-11-2022
Registration No
64/2022
Registration Date
03-11-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Vengurla
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rohit Sunil Mhaplankar
Adv. Shailendra Krushna Marathe
Respondent(s)
Grampanchayat Parulebajar Through Sarpanch Grampanchyat Parule Advocate - Kiran R. Paradkar
Gramsevak Sachiv Grampanchyat Parulebajar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 19-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 01-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary RCS No. 64/2022 | Decided: 26/07/2023 The application filed by the third party/applicant seeking to be impleaded as a defendant in the suit was dismissed. The court found that the applicant failed to establish prima facie connection with the suit property and lacked the status of a necessary or proper party. The plaintiff sought permanent injunction and declaration regarding alleged unauthorized construction on Grampanchayat sewers and did not intend to claim relief against the applicant, therefore cannot be compelled to join him as defendant against his wish. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary RCS No. 64/2022 | Decided: 26/07/2023 The application filed by the third party/applicant seeking to be impleaded as a defendant in the suit was dismissed. The court found that the applicant failed to establish prima facie connection with the suit property and lacked the status of a necessary or proper party. The plaintiff sought permanent injunction and declaration regarding alleged unauthorized construction on Grampanchayat sewers and did not intend to claim relief against the applicant, therefore cannot be compelled to join him as defendant against his wish. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts