Laxmikant Janardan Choukekar vs Snehalata Vasant Pednekar — 31/2024

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHSI050003742024

e-Filing Number

04-12-2024

Filing Number

141/2024

Filing Date

05-Dec-2024

Registration No

31/2024

Registration Date

05-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Vengurla

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxmikant Janardan Choukekar

    Adv. Pavitra Prasad Dhuri

  2. 2.Chandrakant Laxmikant Choukekar Through next friend applicant no 1

    Adv. DHURI PAVITRA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Snehalata Vasant Pednekar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court partially allowed the petition for a succession certificate. The court found that Petitioner 2 (Chandrakant Laxmikant Choukekar) is the legitimate heir of the deceased Disha Laxmikant Choukekar, who died on 10/02/2024, and granted him a formal succession certificate under the Mumbai Civil Court Act, 1827. The court rejected Petitioner 1's claim to joint succession, holding that under Hindu succession law, the deceased's husband and son are the primary heirs, and no other claimants challenged this determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Proclomation

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    Proclomation

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  11. 11-Nov-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  12. 23-Sep-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  13. 09-Sep-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  14. 09-Sep-2025

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  16. 16-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  17. 02-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  18. 21-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  19. 16-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  20. 05-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  21. 05-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  22. 05-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  23. 13-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  24. 05-Dec-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  25. 05-Dec-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 05-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 05-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed the petition for a succession certificate. The court found that Petitioner 2 (Chandrakant Laxmikant Choukekar) is the legitimate heir of the deceased Disha Laxmikant Choukekar, who died on 10/02/2024, and granted him a formal succession certificate under the Mumbai Civil Court Act, 1827. The court rejected Petitioner 1's claim to joint succession, holding that under Hindu succession law, the deceased's husband and son are the primary heirs, and no other claimants challenged this determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case