Swapnil Gopalkrushna Rawal vs Jaywant Sadashiv Palav Advocate - Prathmesh Dipak Naik — 85/2020

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 03-Jul-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSI050002242020

Filing Number

171/2020

Filing Date

17-Aug-2020

Registration No

85/2020

Registration Date

17-Aug-2020

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Vengurla

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Swapnil Gopalkrushna Rawal

    Adv. Tankkar Govind Gopal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jaywant Sadashiv Palav Advocate - Prathmesh Dipak Naik

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  5. 26-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  6. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  7. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  8. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  9. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  10. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  11. 13-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  12. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  13. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  14. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  15. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  16. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  17. 13-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  18. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  19. 21-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  20. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  21. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  22. 14-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  23. 15-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  24. 30-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  25. 16-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  26. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  27. 02-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  28. 11-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  29. 04-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  30. 21-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  31. 07-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  32. 21-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  33. 17-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  34. 13-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  35. 09-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  36. 15-Jul-2023

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: 85/2020 Petitioner: Swapnil Gopalkrushna Rawal Respondent: Jaywant Sadashiv Palav Advocate & Prathmesh Dipak Naik Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found the petitioner's claims regarding loan agreements, land disputes, and alleged fraudulent conduct by the respondent to be unsubstantiated. The court rejected the petitioner's allegations that the respondent conducted unauthorized transactions, misused checks, and violated contractual agreements, ruling that the respondent is not liable to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  37. 15-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  38. 22-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  39. 10-May-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  40. 12-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  41. 29-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  42. 23-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  43. 16-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  44. 03-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  45. 15-Feb-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  46. 21-Jan-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  47. 17-Dec-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  48. 23-Nov-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  49. 16-Nov-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  50. 04-Nov-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  51. 15-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  52. 22-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  53. 25-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  54. 06-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  55. 06-Jul-2022

    EvidenceView PDF

  56. 06-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  57. 08-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  58. 05-May-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  59. 06-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  60. 10-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  61. 17-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  62. 27-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  63. 05-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  64. 24-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  65. 09-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  66. 22-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  67. 01-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  68. 22-Jul-2021

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  69. 30-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  70. 07-May-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  71. 06-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  72. 23-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  73. 10-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  74. 23-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  75. 29-Jan-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  76. 06-Nov-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla

  77. 17-Aug-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  78. 17-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 85/2020 Petitioner: Swapnil Gopalkrushna Rawal Respondent: Jaywant Sadashiv Palav Advocate & Prathmesh Dipak Naik Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found the petitioner's claims regarding loan agreements, land disputes, and alleged fraudulent conduct by the respondent to be unsubstantiated. The court rejected the petitioner's allegations that the respondent conducted unauthorized transactions, misused checks, and violated contractual agreements, ruling that the respondent is not liable to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case