Janardhan Bhikaji Kubal, etc. 5 vs Makarand Shantaram Tannkar, etc. 2 Advocate - Prabhu Bharat Narahari — 5/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSI050000602018
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
11/2018
Filing Date
25-01-2018
Registration No
5/2018
Registration Date
25-01-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Vengurla
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Janardhan Bhikaji Kubal, etc. 5
Adv. BHANAGE SHRIKRISHNA NARAYAN
Anant Bhikaji Kubal power of attorney Janardan Bhikaji Kubal
Ranjana Bhikaji Kubal power of attorney Janardan Bhikaji Kubal
Alka Bhikaji Kubal power of attorney Janardan Bhikaji Kubal
Kiran Bhikaji Kubal power of attorney Janardan Bhikaji Kubal
Respondent(s)
Makarand Shantaram Tannkar, etc. 2 Advocate - Prabhu Bharat Narahari
Vinod Shantaram Tannkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Vengurla
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 10-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 30-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 27-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 23-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The court allowed the defendant's application under Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code to stay the present case. The court found that identical issues, parties, and subject matters exist in a parallel case pending before the Talsildar's court at Vengurla, and therefore held that the present proceedings should be suspended until the other case concludes. The plaintiff's request to withdraw the appeal with cost reimbursement was also rejected, and the defendant was ordered to register the case afresh in the lower court's records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The court allowed the defendant's application under Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code to stay the present case. The court found that identical issues, parties, and subject matters exist in a parallel case pending before the Talsildar's court at Vengurla, and therefore held that the present proceedings should be suspended until the other case concludes. The plaintiff's request to withdraw the appeal with cost reimbursement was also rejected, and the defendant was ordered to register the case afresh in the lower court's records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts