The State Of Maharastra vs Merisiyan Jakasan Disoja Advocate - BILE RAJIV DATTARAM — 370/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSI040007112024

Filing Number

540/2024

Filing Date

03-Dec-2024

Registration No

370/2024

Registration Date

03-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kudal

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

256

Police Station

Police Station Kudal

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharastra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Merisiyan Jakasan Disoja Advocate - BILE RAJIV DATTARAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Case Summary: 370/2024 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate at Kudal acquitted the accused, Merisiyan Jakasan Disoja (49 years), under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence of illegal liquor sale. The court ordered release of the accused with personal bond and sureties, and directed police to preserve the seized liquor bottles for proper disposal per regulations. Key Reasoning: Despite seizure of 34 bottles of branded alcohol from the accused's residence, the court found that the prosecution failed to establish a clear chain of custody and adequate proof of unauthorized sale, noting procedural deficiencies in the investigation that created reasonable doubt about the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  4. 04-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  7. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  9. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  10. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  11. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  12. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  13. 10-Apr-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  14. 17-Mar-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  15. 14-Feb-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  16. 24-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  17. 03-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 03-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 370/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 370/2024 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate at Kudal acquitted the accused, Merisiyan Jakasan Disoja (49 years), under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence of illegal liquor sale. The court ordered release of the accused with personal bond and sureties, and directed police to preserve the seized liquor bottles for proper disposal per regulations. Key Reasoning: Despite seizure of 34 bottles of branded alcohol from the accused's residence, the court found that the prosecution failed to establish a clear chain of custody and adequate proof of unauthorized sale, noting procedural deficiencies in the investigation that created reasonable doubt about the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case