SATISH VASUDEV DHURI vs SARPANCH GRAMPANCHAYAT PINGULI Advocate - PADATE GAURAV TULASHIDAS — 99/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34 AND 38. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Order on Exh Next hearing 21-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSI040006122024

e-Filing Number

19-10-2024

Filing Number

167/2024

Filing Date

19-Oct-2024

Registration No

99/2024

Registration Date

19-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kudal

Judge

3-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34 AND 38
Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATISH VASUDEV DHURI

    Adv. Bhaurao Prakash Parab

  2. 2.JAGDISH RAJARAM DHURI

    Adv. SHIRSAT KULBHUSHAN MANGESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SARPANCH GRAMPANCHAYAT PINGULI Advocate - PADATE GAURAV TULASHIDAS

  2. 2.GRAMSEVAK GRAMPANCHAYAT PINGULI

  3. 3.GATAVIKAR ADHIKARI PANCHAYAT SAMITI KUDAL

  4. 4.OFFICE INCHARGE DEVASHTAN VYAVASTHAPAN SAMITI KOLHAPUR

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  9. 19-Sep-2025

    Order on Exhibit

    This document is a letter dated 19.09.2025 from advocate S.N. Ajit Bhanage regarding a dispute between the petitioners and Grampanchayat Pinguli officials. The letter outlines issues related to alleged procedural violations by the Sarpanch and other Panchayat officials concerning accounts and administrative matters. The advocate addresses concerns about improper financial management and requests intervention. However, this is not a court order but rather a preliminary legal correspondence, so no formal judicial outcome (bail, petition allowance/dismissal, adjournment) is stated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 19-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  11. 16-Sep-2025

    Compromise

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  12. 30-Aug-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  13. 30-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  14. 29-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  16. 13-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  17. 06-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  18. 24-Jul-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  19. 10-Jul-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  20. 19-Jun-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  21. 05-May-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  22. 22-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  23. 15-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  24. 26-Mar-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  25. 12-Mar-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  26. 12-Mar-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  27. 12-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  28. 06-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  29. 27-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  30. 13-Jan-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  31. 13-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  32. 23-Dec-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  33. 09-Dec-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  34. 29-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  35. 22-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  36. 21-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  37. 13-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  38. 12-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  39. 25-Oct-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  40. 21-Oct-2024

    Order on T.I.

  41. 21-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c., Kudal

  42. 19-Oct-2024

    Order on Exhibit

  43. 19-Oct-2024

    Order on Exhibit

  44. 19-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 19-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a letter dated 19.09.2025 from advocate S.N. Ajit Bhanage regarding a dispute between the petitioners and Grampanchayat Pinguli officials. The letter outlines issues related to alleged procedural violations by the Sarpanch and other Panchayat officials concerning accounts and administrative matters. The advocate addresses concerns about improper financial management and requests intervention. However, this is not a court order but rather a preliminary legal correspondence, so no formal judicial outcome (bail, petition allowance/dismissal, adjournment) is stated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case